45index /100
M1 · Clinic licence 5 · 13%
UNVERIFIED The clinic publicly publishes its licence number 20101000667 (ฆสพ.สบส.867/2569); we confirmed it in the MoPH facility registry (สถานพยาบาล), matched on Chonburi province. The only entry with verified licence transparency.
M2 · Doctor traceability 1 · 13%
UNVERIFIED The branch physician is named neither on the site nor in public sources; a Medical Council (checkmd) check is impossible without a name. No public name ≠ no doctor — this is untraceability, not an accusation.
M3 · Service specificity 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED Injectables / laser / skincare menu is stated under the chain brand, but without branch-level procedure specificity.
M4 · Product disclosure 2 · 8%
SECONDARY Specific injectable product brands are not publicly disclosed; only promo mentions, with no product name or authenticity policy.
M5 · Device traceability 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED Device procedures are mentioned but without specific device models or a safety-information mapping.
M6 · Price transparency 2 · 10%
UNVERIFIED Only promo price fragments for injectables are published; there is no branch-level price list.
M7 · Russian-language path 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED A Russian patient path is not confirmed: content is EN/TH, with no stated Russian coordinator or Russian-language page.
M8 · Source readability 4 · 5%
SECONDARY The chain site is indexed and machine-legible — the source is reproducible for re-audit.
M9 · Safety disclosure 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED General procedure information is present; procedure-specific consent / contraindications are not publicly published.
E1 · Cleanliness of promises 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Injectable promos are aggressive (discount campaigns), but no bright-line overclaim ("100% safe", "permanent", guaranteed result) was found.
E2 · Consistency of facts 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The public record is consistent within the chain template; no internal contradictions found.
E3 · Reputation hygiene 3 · 5%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Reviews exist but are not counted as a quality proxy; no public correction mechanism is stated.
The only clinic in the register that publishes its licence number — and it checked out in the MoPH registry: on axis M1 this is the top of the scale. Everything else is a standard chain storefront: the branch doctor is unnamed (M2), product brands and device models are undisclosed, and there is no branch price list. Transparent where it is cheap (licence-as-marketing) and quiet where it matters to the buyer.
Clinic licensed: yes
Doctor traceable: caveat
In register scope: yes
Clinic operating: yes
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate procedure outcomes, a doctor's skill, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the licence, the doctor, the products, the prices, the Russian-language path, safety disclosure — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.