Chartier Clinic, Pattaya
licence verified №20101003458
49index /100
M1 · Clinic licence 4 · 13%
UNVERIFIED We confirmed licence 20101003458 in the MoPH facility registry (สถานพยาบาล) — valid to 2034. Unlike Apex, the clinic does not itself publish the number, so transparency here is confirmed by our check rather than by the storefront.
M2 · Doctor traceability 2 · 13%
SECONDARY The doctor is known only from a secondary source (an aggregator), not from the clinic's own page; a Medical Council (checkmd) check is pending. This is untraceability via the primary source, not an accusation.
M3 · Service specificity 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED An injectables and laser menu is stated, but without deep procedure-level specificity per item.
M4 · Product disclosure 3 · 8%
SECONDARY Injectable product disclosure is partial — noticeably fuller than most chain storefronts, but without a full authenticity policy per brand.
M5 · Device traceability 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED Device procedures are mentioned, but specific device models and their mapping to safety information are not fully disclosed.
M6 · Price transparency 3 · 10%
SECONDARY The only clinic in the register with structured public prices — but they are published via GoWabi (a secondary source, ~30-day freshness window), not by the clinic's own price list.
M7 · Russian-language path 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED A Russian patient path is not confirmed: no Russian-language page or coordinator is publicly stated.
M8 · Source readability 3 · 5%
SECONDARY The public record is indexed and machine-legible; the source is reproducible for re-audit.
M9 · Safety disclosure 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED General procedure information is present; procedure-specific consent and contraindications are not publicly published.
E1 · Cleanliness of promises 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED editorial — No bright-line overclaim ("100% safe", guaranteed result) was found in public materials.
E2 · Consistency of facts 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The public record is consistent; no internal contradictions found.
E3 · Reputation hygiene 3 · 5%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Reviews exist but are not counted as a quality proxy; no public correction mechanism is stated.
The licence is confirmed in the MoPH registry (20101003458, valid to 2034) — high on axis M1, though the clinic does not itself publish the number. Its strength is being the only clinic in the register with structured public prices, but via GoWabi (a secondary source). Its weak point is the doctor, known only from a secondary source (M2), with a Medical Council check pending. Transparent on licence and price, thin on doctor traceability.
Clinic licensed: yes
Doctor traceable: caveat
In register scope: yes
Clinic operating: yes
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate procedure outcomes, a doctor's skill, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the licence, the doctor, the products, the prices, the Russian-language path, safety disclosure — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.