Gangnam Clinic, Pattaya
check pending
29index /100
M1 · Clinic licence 2 · 13%
UNVERIFIED The clinic does not publish a verifiable licence number; the status is claimed, with the MoPH registry check pending (no Thai IP for a facility match).
M2 · Doctor traceability 1 · 13%
SECONDARY The branch doctor is named neither on the site nor in public sources; a Medical Council (checkmd) check is impossible without a name. A missing public name means untraceability, not an accusation.
M3 · Service specificity 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED A medical-aesthetics menu (injectables, device procedures) is stated under the chain brand, but without branch-level procedure specificity.
M4 · Product disclosure 2 · 8%
SECONDARY Specific injectable product brands and an authenticity policy are not publicly disclosed; only general mentions appear.
M5 · Device traceability 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED Device procedures are stated but without specific device models or a safety-information mapping.
M6 · Price transparency 3 · 10%
SECONDARY Partial prices for injectables are published; there is no full branch-level price list.
M7 · Russian-language path 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED A Russian patient path is not confirmed: no Russian-language page or coordinator is stated.
M8 · Source readability 3 · 5%
SECONDARY The chain site is indexed and machine-legible; the source is reproducible for re-audit.
M9 · Safety disclosure 1 · 7%
UNVERIFIED Safety information — contraindications, consent, aftercare — is essentially absent. Not found after protocol.
E1 · Cleanliness of promises 2 · 12%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Injectable promos are noticeable; no bright-line overclaim ("100% safe", guaranteed result) was found.
E2 · Consistency of facts 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED editorial — A branch address block appears to repeat the chain's Bangkok template — the Pattaya address needs confirmation; noted as unresolved but not scored as a contradiction.
E3 · Reputation hygiene 2 · 5%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Reviews exist but are not counted as a quality proxy; no public correction mechanism is stated.
A Korean-format chain clinic with a standard storefront: a licence is claimed without a verifiable number (registry check pending), and the branch doctor is unnamed (M2). A notable detail — a branch address block repeats the chain's Bangkok template, so the Pattaya address needs confirmation (noted, but not scored as a contradiction). The device menu is stated (M5) but without models; safety disclosure (M9) is essentially empty.
Clinic licensed: caveat
Doctor traceable: caveat
In register scope: yes
Clinic operating: yes
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate procedure outcomes, a doctor's skill, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the licence, the doctor, the products, the prices, the Russian-language path, safety disclosure — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.