Nicha Clinic, Pattaya
check pending
36index /100
M1 · Clinic licence 2 · 13%
UNVERIFIED No licence number is published; the licence is claimed, MoPH registry check pending. Claimed — registry check pending.
M2 · Doctor traceability 2 · 13%
SECONDARY A doctor is named, but the role conflicts across sources — aesthetician versus plastic surgeon. We do not resolve this conflict remotely; a Medical Council (checkmd) trace is pending.
M3 · Service specificity 3 · 6%
SECONDARY An injectables menu is stated, but without procedure-level specificity on protocols or indications.
M4 · Product disclosure 2 · 8%
SECONDARY Specific product brands are not publicly disclosed; no authenticity policy is stated.
M5 · Device traceability 3 · 8%
SECONDARY Device procedures are mentioned but without specific device models or a safety-information mapping.
M6 · Price transparency 2 · 10%
SECONDARY Prices appear only in secondary sources and conflict with one another; there is no published structured price list.
M7 · Russian-language path 2 · 6%
SECONDARY A Russian patient path is claimed by one secondary source and denied by another — the conflict is unresolved; it cannot be scored and must be settled by a phone call.
M8 · Source readability 3 · 5%
SECONDARY The presence is indexed; reproducibility is moderate, but secondary sources give conflicting data.
M9 · Safety disclosure 2 · 7%
UNVERIFIED Safety information is thin: procedure-specific consent / contraindications are not publicly published.
E1 · Cleanliness of promises 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Promo language is within norms; no bright-line overclaim ("100% safe", guaranteed result) was found.
E2 · Consistency of facts 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Within the provider's own record there are no contradictions; the discrepancies are between secondary sources (doctor role, Russian path), not within its own publication.
E3 · Reputation hygiene 3 · 5%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Reviews exist but are not counted as a quality proxy; no public correction mechanism is stated.
A doctor is named, but the role contradicts itself across sources — aesthetician or plastic surgeon; we do not resolve this remotely and do not score it. A Russian patient path is claimed by one secondary source and denied by another — a conflict to be settled by a phone call, not by scoring. The licence is claimed — registry check pending.
Clinic licensed: caveat
Doctor traceable: caveat
In register scope: yes
Clinic operating: yes
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate procedure outcomes, a doctor's skill, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the licence, the doctor, the products, the prices, the Russian-language path, safety disclosure — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.