René Clinic, Pattaya
licence verified №20101006366
33index /100
M1 · Clinic licence 4 · 13%
UNVERIFIED The facility itself is licensed: number 20101006366 confirmed in the MoPH facility registry (สถานพยาบาล), matched on Chonburi province. Below the top of the scale because the clinic does not publish the number itself (unlike Apex) — transparency confirmed by us, not by the storefront.
M2 · Doctor traceability 1 · 13%
UNVERIFIED No physician is named on the site; a Medical Council (checkmd) check is impossible without a name. No public name ≠ no doctor — this is untraceability, not an accusation.
M3 · Service specificity 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED An injectables and device-procedure menu is stated, but without procedure-level specificity or protocol breakdown.
M4 · Product disclosure 2 · 8%
SECONDARY Specific product brands are not disclosed; a "100% original" claim appears with no brand named — there is nothing in that text to verify authenticity against.
M5 · Device traceability 3 · 8%
UNVERIFIED Device procedures are mentioned but without specific device models or a safety-information mapping.
M6 · Price transparency 2 · 10%
UNVERIFIED Only promo price fragments for injectables are published; there is no price list.
M7 · Russian-language path 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED A Russian patient path is not confirmed: no Russian-language page or coordinator is stated.
M8 · Source readability 3 · 5%
SECONDARY The site is indexed and broadly machine-legible — the source is reproducible for re-audit.
M9 · Safety disclosure 2 · 7%
UNVERIFIED Safety information is thin; before/after photos are used as proof, while procedure-specific consent and contraindications are not publicly published.
E1 · Cleanliness of promises 2 · 12%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Internal E1-watch: before/after photos as proof and superlative wording ("100% original"). No bright-line overclaim with a cap trigger ("100% safe", guaranteed result) was found.
E2 · Consistency of facts 2 · 7%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Little public record to cross-check; no clear internal contradictions were found.
E3 · Reputation hygiene 2 · 5%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Reviews exist but are not counted as a quality proxy; no public correction mechanism is stated.
One real strength: the facility itself is licensed — we confirmed number 20101006366 in the MoPH registry. Beyond that it is empty where it matters to a buyer: the physician is unnamed on the site and untraceable in public sources (M2), specific product brands are undisclosed, and a "100% original" claim is made with no brand named — nothing to verify against. Before/after photos are used as proof; there is no published price list.
Clinic licensed: yes
Doctor traceable: caveat
In register scope: yes
Clinic operating: yes
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate procedure outcomes, a doctor's skill, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the licence, the doctor, the products, the prices, the Russian-language path, safety disclosure — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.