The Klinique, Pattaya
check pending
43index /100
M1 · Clinic licence 2 · 13%
SECONDARY The Klinique is a public company, but the branch licence number is not publicly published; a MoPH registry check is pending. Licence status is "claimed, not verified".
M2 · Doctor traceability 1 · 13%
UNVERIFIED The branch physician is named neither on the site nor in public sources; a Medical Council (checkmd) check is impossible without a name. No public name ≠ no doctor — this is untraceability, not an accusation.
M3 · Service specificity 4 · 6%
UNVERIFIED The procedure menu is documented in detail — in scope and specificity, stronger than most clinics in the register.
M4 · Product disclosure 2 · 8%
SECONDARY Specific injectable product brands are not publicly disclosed, and no authenticity policy is stated.
M5 · Device traceability 4 · 8%
UNVERIFIED Device / laser procedures are documented in detail — one of the strongest in the register on device disclosure.
M6 · Price transparency 4 · 10%
SECONDARY Structured public prices are available, but via GoWabi (a secondary source, ~30-day freshness window), not the clinic's own price list.
M7 · Russian-language path 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED A Russian patient path is not confirmed: no Russian-language page or coordinator is publicly stated.
M8 · Source readability 3 · 5%
SECONDARY The chain site is indexed and machine-legible; the source is reproducible for re-audit.
M9 · Safety disclosure 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED General procedure and contraindication information is present; procedure-specific consent is not fully publicly disclosed.
E1 · Cleanliness of promises 3 · 12%
UNVERIFIED editorial — No bright-line overclaim ("100% safe", guaranteed result) was found in public materials.
E2 · Consistency of facts 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The public record is consistent within the chain template; no internal contradictions found.
E3 · Reputation hygiene 3 · 5%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Reviews exist but are not counted as a quality proxy; no public correction mechanism is stated.
A public company with strong documentation: a detailed scope (M3=4), detailed device disclosure (M5=4) and structured public prices (M6=4, but via GoWabi — a secondary source). Its weak points are structural: the branch licence is unconfirmed (registry check pending) and the branch doctor is unnamed (M2=1), so a Medical Council trace is impossible. Well-lit on services, dark on the "who" and on the licence.
Clinic licensed: caveat
Doctor traceable: caveat
In register scope: yes
Clinic operating: yes
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate procedure outcomes, a doctor's skill, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the licence, the doctor, the products, the prices, the Russian-language path, safety disclosure — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.